Woodville at Sea Breeze: The Only Delivered Project Here With No Small Apartment

Thirty-six of the thirty-nine Sea Breeze projects that publish an area range start under 65 m². Thirty-four start at 62 m² or less. The resort is built around the small apartment.

Woodville starts at 95 m².

That is the third-largest entry area of the thirty-nine, and the two above it are villa projects - Private Villas at 599 m² and Villas at 230 m². Among the apartment and townhouse projects, Woodville has the largest smallest unit on the resort. You cannot buy a studio here, because there is not one.

What the developer publishes

Nine fields, from the project page read 5 November 2026.

Field	Published
Units	107
Areas	95-193 m²
Floors	2-3
Completion	delivered
Status	delivered
Finishing	fit-out
Price	$270,000 - $555,000
Advertised rate	from $2,720/m²
Project scale	1.4 ha, third coastline

The page names a large outdoor swimming pool, a children's playground and a leisure area with tables, and describes the units as a mix of townhouses and apartments across two to three floors. No developer, architect or contractor is named in the text.

The advertised rate here almost describes the smallest unit

Across this resort the advertised per-square-metre figure almost never matches the smallest apartment. Divide the entry price by the advertised rate and you get the area of the unit those two numbers agree on - and on 31 of the 33 projects with complete data, that area is larger than the published minimum, because the cheapest apartment and the smallest apartment are different apartments.

Woodville is one of the closest misses on the resort:

Project	Implied entry area	Published minimum	Ratio
Whitestone Beach	40.8 m²	41 m²	0.995
Lighthouse II	41.0 m²	41 m²	0.999
Harbour Residence	49.3 m²	48 m²	1.027
Woodville	99.3 m²	95 m²	1.045
Premium Residence	45.6 m²	43 m²	1.059
Palm Beach	66.1 m²	62 m²	1.066
Yes	27.8 m²	26 m²	1.069

$270,000 ÷ $2,720/m² = 99.3 m², against a published minimum of 95 m². The gap is 4.3 m², or 4.5 per cent - small enough that the cheapest unit and the smallest unit here are either the same one or close neighbours. For comparison, Polo Residences implies 113.8 m² against a 53 m² minimum, a factor of 2.15.

The other end behaves too: $555,000 ÷ 193 m² = $2,876/m², above the advertised $2,720, which is what you would expect of the most expensive unit. Woodville's three published figures are consistent with each other. On this resort that is unusual enough to be the reason to look at it.

And it is not because the range is narrow

The obvious explanation would be that Woodville's areas span only 2.03× from smallest to largest - sixth-narrowest of the thirty-nine, against a median of 4.65× - so there is less room for the cheapest and the smallest to drift apart.

We tested that, and it is false. Across the 33 projects with complete data the rank correlation between area span and the cheapest-versus-smallest gap is 0.197 - effectively nothing.

Narrowest spans	Span	Gap ratio
Sky Park	1.71×	1.144
Private Villas	2.01×	1.836
Woodville	2.03×	1.045
Park Residences 4	2.76×	1.574
Park Residences 3	2.77×	1.672

Private Villas has almost exactly Woodville's span and one of the widest gaps on the resort. And the tightest match of all forty, Lighthouse II, has the second-widest span at 9.34×, while Lighthouse I has the widest at 18.38× and a gap of 2.15.

So the gap is not a structural artefact you can estimate from the area range. It is a fact about which particular unit a developer has priced cheapest, and it has to be checked project by project. Woodville's consistency is a property of Woodville, not of low-rise projects or narrow ranges.

Why the consistency is the practical point

On 31 of the 33 projects here with complete data, the advertised per-square-metre figure cannot be used to sanity-check a quoted price: multiply it by the smallest published area and you get a number no apartment carries, sometimes by $150,000 or more.

Woodville is one of the few where that check works. If a seller quotes you $290,000 for a unit here, you can divide by $2,720 and ask whether the area is really about 107 m². If the arithmetic does not land near the area you are being shown, something in the quote needs explaining. That is a small tool, and on this resort it is a rare one - which is the practical reason this project is worth a buyer's attention beyond its format.

Two to three storeys, on the third coastline

Woodville is 107 units on 1.4 hectares - 76 per hectare, the eighth-sparsest of the thirty-six projects publishing both figures. The densest on the resort publish 488, 407 and 314 per hectare, so this is a different kind of site rather than a smaller version of the same one.

It is also one of only three projects on the third coastline, with Park Residences 2 and 3. Sixteen projects are on the first coastline and twelve on the second; the third is where the low-rise stock sits.

At two to three floors, 107 units and 95 m² minimums, the format is the opposite of the towers: no studios, no high floors, no sea-view premium from a twentieth storey. What it is, in a resort that has delivered 4,896 apartments and plans 28,937, is 2.2 per cent of the finished stock in a format almost nothing else here repeats.

Fit-out means neither shell nor furnished

Woodville's finishing field reads fit-out - one of only eight of the forty projects with that exact wording, alongside Palm Beach, Lighthouse I, Marina Village, Skyline, Panorama by Elie Saab, Arabian Ranches and Brabus Island.

The resort's finishing vocabulary has three tiers, and this is the middle one. Nineteen projects are sold without fit-out - a bare shell. Eight are sold with fit-out: a finished apartment, which on this resort's wording means surfaces, not furniture. Eleven use some form of turnkey, and our White Villas guide covers the most mature furnished product among them.

So a $270,000 entry price here buys a finished 95-99 m² unit, not a concrete floor - which is why it cannot be compared with a without-fit-out entry price without adding a fit-out cost that none of the project pages we have read publishes. Our Harbour Residence guide sets out what that does to a shell project's headline number.

What the page publishes about paying for it

Route	Terms as published
Full payment	100%
Instalments to 12 months	interest-free, from 30% down
Instalments to 36 months	interest-free, for 1+1 units and larger
Studios	down payment from 50%
Mortgage	ABB Bank, Azerbaijani citizens, official employment and salary income in Azerbaijan

Note the studio line. It is printed on this page as it is on the others, and Woodville has no studios - a tell that these are resort-wide terms reproduced on every project page rather than terms negotiated for this one. The page's return block behaves the same way: annual property value growth of 15-35% and annual rental yield from 8%, attributed to completed Sea Breeze projects in 2023-2025. That is a template, not a projection for this project, and our Palazzo guide sets out how we established it.

Six questions to ask before you sign

1. What exactly does "fit-out" include here? Ask for the specification as a contract annexe. On this resort's wording it means a finished apartment without furniture, but the page does not itemise it.
2. What is the exact area of the $270,000 unit? If it is 95 to 99 m², the advertised $2,720/m² describes it - which would make Woodville one of the few projects here where the headline rate is usable.
3. Townhouse or apartment? The page describes a mix across two to three floors and does not say how the 107 units split between the two formats.
4. What is the monthly service charge per square metre? Not published for this project, on a delivered site with a pool and landscaped grounds.
5. What is the parking provision? The page publishes no parking count and no ratio.
6. How does the third coastline affect resale? Sixteen projects sit on the first coastline and two of the three on the third are Park Residences phases; the comparison set for a resale here is small.

Our master list of all forty projects records what each page publishes, including the blanks.

Sources

• Sea Breeze official project page, woodville-2, read 5 November 2026 - 107 units described as a mix of townhouses and apartments; 95-193 m²; 2-3 floors; delivered; finishing "fit-out"; $270,000-$555,000; from $2,720/m²; 1.4 ha; third coastline; large outdoor swimming pool, children's playground, leisure area with tables; payment terms as tabled above; the 15-35% growth and from-8% yield block. No parking count, no service charge, no split between townhouses and apartments, and no developer, architect or contractor named in text. The nine catalogue fields match the row collected on 25 October 2026.
• The forty-project catalogue collected from the developer's own project pages on 25 October 2026, held as .claude/seo/data/seabreeze-official-2026-10-25.csv. Every count, rank, ratio and correlation in this guide was computed from that file in code rather than typed: the 36-of-39 and 34-of-39 entry-area counts, the third-largest minimum, the implied-entry-area table and its seven rows, the 2.03× span and its sixth rank of thirty-nine against a 4.65× median, the 0.197 rank correlation across the 33 projects with complete price and area data, the 76 per hectare and its eighth-sparsest rank of thirty-six, the three third-coastline projects, the eight projects with the exact finishing wording "fit-out", and the 4,896 delivered and 28,937 catalogue totals.

Every per-square-metre figure here is our own division of the developer's published prices by the developer's published areas, and is labelled as such. No broker listing is used as the source of any figure.

Not verified: the exact area of the cheapest unit, which is what would settle whether $2,720/m² describes it; how the 107 units split between townhouses and apartments; what the fit-out specification covers item by item; the cost of the gap between fit-out and furnished, which none of the project pages we have read publishes; the service charge; the parking count or ratio; how many units have sold or resold and at what price; and what any unit here has actually changed hands for since delivery. We have not seen a floor plan, a unit mix or a price list for this project.