Lighthouse 2 at Sea Breeze: 2,010 Apartments, the Resort's Largest Project, and Its Only Exact Price

Two things make Lighthouse 2 worth a page of its own, and they pull in opposite directions.

It is the largest project in the Sea Breeze catalogue — 2,010 apartments, more than any of the other thirty-nine, on a 9-hectare plot of the second coastline. And it is the project whose advertised price per square metre is the most accurate of all forty: $2,100 against an entry apartment that works out to $2,098. In a catalogue where the median gap between those two numbers is 26.5%, this one is 0.1%.

What the developer publishes

Field	Published figure
Apartments	2,010
Area range	41–383 m²
Floors	8
Completion	December 2027
Status	in construction
Finishing	with/without fit-out
Price	$86,000 – $991,000
Advertised rate	from $2,100/m²
Site area	9 ha
Location	second coastline

Every figure above was read from the developer's own project page, collected on 25 October 2026 and held in .claude/seo/data/seabreeze-official-2026-10-25.csv with the other 39 projects.

The only advertised rate in the catalogue that is effectively exact

Thirty-three of the forty projects publish an area range, a price range and an advertised per-metre rate — enough to check the rate against the project's own numbers. The check is one division: the smallest apartment is 41 m² and nothing is offered below $86,000, so the entry apartment costs at least $86,000 ÷ 41 = $2,098 per square metre.

The page advertises $2,100. The gap is $2 per square metre, or 0.1% — the narrowest of all thirty-three.

	Advertised rate	Entry apartment works out at	Gap
Lighthouse 2	$2,100/m²	$2,098/m²	0.1%
Whitestone Beach	$2,500/m²	$2,488/m²	0.5%
Harbour Residence	$2,700/m²	$2,773/m²	2.6%
catalogue median			26.5%
Prime Residence 3	$2,000/m²	$4,619/m²	57%
Marina Village	$2,150/m²	$5,368/m²	60%

Run it the other way and the reading gets cleaner still: $86,000 ÷ $2,100 = 40.95 m², and the published minimum area is 41. The advertised rate is what you get by taking the entry apartment's actual rate and rounding to the nearest hundred dollars. That is the field working as a buyer would assume it works — and in 31 of the 33 projects, it does not. Our Harbour Residence guide covers the next-closest case, and our Raffles and Swissôtel guide the one where the gap reaches 49%.

One caution before anyone reads too much into this. An accurate per-metre field tells you the developer calculated it from a real unit. It tells you nothing about whether the price is good, whether the building is good, or whether December 2027 will hold. It is a point about the quality of a disclosure, not about the quality of an asset.

2,010 apartments is the largest project on the resort

No other project in the catalogue reaches two thousand. Reportage Heights is second at 1,885, Park Residences 4 third at 1,872, and Park Lane fourth at 1,756.

The site is correspondingly large — 9 hectares, the fifth-biggest of the forty, behind Blue Waters at 17, Arabian Ranches at 13, Reportage Heights at 11 and Malibu Residence at 9.2. Density works out to 223 apartments per hectare, rank 7 of the 36 projects publishing both figures. So it is dense, but not extreme: Park Lane is at 488 per hectare, more than twice as tight.

Scale is the thing to weigh here, and it cuts both ways. Two thousand apartments means more amenity load the completed scheme can support, and it also means two thousand units that can come to the resale market at once. A buyer planning an exit in the early 2030s is competing with the other 2,009 apartments in the same building before competing with anything else on the resort.

The metre barely moves across a nine-fold range of apartments

The area range runs 41 to 383 m² — the largest apartment is 9.3 times the smallest. Across that whole span, the implied per-metre figures move very little:

• Smallest apartment: at least $2,098/m² ($86,000 ÷ 41 m²)
• Largest apartment: at most $2,587/m² ($991,000 ÷ 383 m²)

That is a spread of roughly 23% across a nine-fold difference in size. By the standards of this catalogue that is tight; most projects show far more movement, and eight of them publish a rate the largest apartment cannot even reach.

The practical reading for a buyer is that on this project, size and price scale together more nearly than usual. Going larger here does not carry the per-metre penalty it carries elsewhere on the resort — and going smaller does not buy the per-metre discount a small unit sometimes does. Both bounds are our own arithmetic on the developer's published price and area ranges, not quotes for any specific apartment.

"With/without fit-out" is a choice only four projects offer

Thirty-six of the forty projects publish a single finishing standard: without fit-out, with fit-out, or turnkey. Lighthouse 2 is one of four that publish a choice — the others being Polo Residences, Private Villas and Villas.

This matters for the price arithmetic above, and it is the one place where the otherwise clean numbers on this page get murky. If the same unit can be bought bare or finished, the published $86,000 almost certainly refers to the bare version, and the finished price is not published anywhere. The developer gives no figure for what fit-out adds, on this project or any other on the resort, and we will not invent one.

So the honest statement is layered: the advertised rate is exact for whichever version of the apartment the $86,000 describes, and the page does not say which. Ask which standard the quoted price includes, and ask for the other standard's price in writing before comparing this project with a fit-out project like Palm Beach or a turnkey one.

The cheapest entry price on the second coastline

Twelve projects sit on the second coastline. Lighthouse 2 is the cheapest of them to enter, and by a clear margin at the very bottom of the range.

Second-coastline project	Entry price	Apartments	Completion
Lighthouse 2	$86,000	2,010	December 2027
Malibu Residence	$97,000	1,010	December 2028
Park Residences 4	$99,000	1,872	February 2029
Whitestone Beach	$102,000	406	December 2027
Prime Residence 2	$116,000	980	February 2029
Sky Park	$116,000	1,008	December 2028
Paradise	$121,000	1,004	February 2029

Across the whole forty-project catalogue, $86,000 is the fourth-cheapest entry price, behind Park Lane at $75,000, Premium Residence at $82,000 and Aparthotel Yes at $82,000. It is also, at December 2027, the earliest handover of any project at that price level — the three cheaper ones all deliver later. Our Sky Park guide covers the nearest comparable on the same coastline.

Sixteen buildings, not one, and the project's own site publishes it

Divide 2,010 by 8 and you get 251 apartments per floor, which is the figure this page carried before. It was an artifact of a missing field. The project's own website, 2.lighthouse.az, publishes what the resort catalogue does not: Lighthouse II is 16 buildings, not one. On that split the figure is 126 apartments per building, and about 16 per floor in each building - entirely ordinary. A per-floor number computed from a project total is only meaningful for a single building, and nothing in the catalogue says which projects are single buildings.

The same site resolves the naming. It calls the finished phase Lighthouse I and gives it four 8-storey buildings, 399 apartments and 27 penthouses - and 399 plus 27 is 426, which is exactly the apartment count, the floor count and the delivered status that the catalogue files under Lighthouse 3. So there is no missing Lighthouse 1. The catalogue's numbering runs opposite to the project's own, and this page previously recorded the absence without being able to explain it.

One inconsistency survives inside the catalogue itself. For the delivered phase it summed apartments and penthouses to reach 426; for this one it published 2,010 apartments and left the 16 penthouses out, so the real unit total here is 2,026. The same catalogue counted the same two things two different ways, which is why the 2,010 in our headline is an apartment count and not a unit count.

Our master list of all forty projects carries the apartment counts and site areas for every project, which is as far as the published record goes on this question.

What is not published, and what to ask

1. How are the 16 buildings phased, and which are finished first? The catalogue publishes one completion date for all 2,010 apartments.
2. Does the $86,000 include fit-out or not, and what does the other option cost? The page offers both and prices one.
3. What is the parking ratio? 2,010 apartments on 9 hectares makes this central.
4. What are the common charges? Not published, and on a 2,010-unit scheme they are a material cost.
5. Is December 2027 contractual, with a penalty? A catalogue date is not a contract date.
6. How many of the 2,010 are sold? The published range is an asking range, and resale competition on this project is internal before it is external.

Sources

• Sea Breeze official project page, lighthouse-2-2, read 25 October 2026 — 2,010 apartments; 41–383 m²; 8 floors; completion December 2027; status in construction; finishing "with/without fit-out"; $86,000–$991,000; from $2,100/m²; 9 ha; second coastline. Collected in .claude/seo/data/seabreeze-official-2026-10-25.csv with the other 39 projects.
• The per-metre test was run in code over all 33 catalogued projects that publish an area range, a price range and an advertised rate, using only those published fields. The divisions are price_from ÷ area_min and price_to ÷ area_max. The 26.5% median is across those 33.
• Apartment-count, site-area, density and per-floor rankings were computed over the same 40-project collection, across the 36 and 38 projects where the required fields parse.
• Lighthouse's own project site, 2.lighthouse.az/about, read 4 November 2026 - Lighthouse I: four 8-storey buildings, 399 apartments, 27 penthouses, "construction completed". Lighthouse II: 16 buildings, 8 floors, 2,010 apartments, 16 penthouses, "construction in progress". It publishes no area range, no site area and no completion dates.

Not verified: whether the $86,000 is the bare or finished price; the cost of fit-out, which none of the project pages we have read publishes; the parking ratio; common charges; how many apartments are sold; how the 16 buildings are phased and whether any are finished; and whether the December 2027 completion date has moved since 25 October 2026. The resort's website returns 403 to our tools, so nothing here comes from it beyond the project pages already collected on that date.