Sky Park Sea Breeze: 1,008 Apartments, 24 Floors and a $258,000 Ceiling

Sky Park is the Sea Breeze project with the narrowest apartment range on the resort and one of the lowest price ceilings of any large building there. Both facts come from the developer's own project page, and both matter more than the headline entry price of $116,000.

Sky Park in One Table

	Sky Park
Apartments	1,008
Floors	24
Apartment area	52-89 m²
Price from	$116,000
Price up to	$258,000
Per m², from	$1,950
Completion	December 2028
Status	in construction
Finishing	without fit-out
Project scale	5.25 ha
Coastline	second

Every figure above was read from the official Sky Park project page on 25 October 2026 and is held in our own data file. The resort's site now returns a 403 to our tools, so that file is the record this page works from - a point we repeat because it changes what you should trust here and what you should re-check yourself.

The Cheapest Apartment Is Not the Cheapest Metre

This is the one piece of arithmetic worth doing before you call anyone about Sky Park.

The page publishes three numbers that sit together: the smallest apartment is 52 m², the cheapest apartment is $116,000, and the cheapest metre is $1,950.

	Arithmetic	Rate
Cheapest apartment, at the smallest area	$116,000 ÷ 52 m²	$2,231 per m²
Cheapest metre the page advertises	published	$1,950 per m²
Most expensive apartment, at the largest area	$258,000 ÷ 89 m²	$2,899 per m²

The entry unit therefore costs about $2,231 a metre, roughly 14% above the project's own advertised floor of $1,950. For a real apartment to sell at $1,950 a metre and still cost at least $116,000, it has to be about 60 m² or larger. That is well inside the 52-89 m² band, so nothing here is contradictory - but it does mean the advertised "from $1,950/m²" and the advertised "from $116,000" are describing two different apartments.

The practical reading: neither of the two apartments the page actually describes costs $1,950 a metre. The cheapest one works out at $2,231, which is 14% more. The largest one, at the top price, works out at $2,899, which is 49% more. The $1,950 rate belongs to some third apartment whose area and floor the page does not give, and the only thing arithmetic can tell you about it is that it must be around 60 m² or larger.

Treat that field with more suspicion than its wording invites. Of the 33 catalogue projects that publish a price range, an area range and a per-metre figure, seven publish a per-metre figure higher than the rate their own top price and largest area imply - at Skyline it is $4,000 a metre against a top price that works out at $1,594. In those seven, "from $X per m²" cannot be a floor across the stock, because the stock contradicts it. Sky Park is not one of the seven, so its $1,950 is at least arithmetically possible - but the field is plainly not a dependable floor anywhere in this catalogue, and the number worth asking for is a rate attached to a named unit.

A $258,000 Ceiling on a 1,008-Apartment Tower

Sky Park's price ceiling is unusually low for its size. Across the 40-project catalogue we hold - set out in full in our master list of Sea Breeze projects - only one project with more than 400 apartments has a lower top price.

Project	Price from	Price up to	Apartments
Park Residences 4	$99,000	$214,000	1,872
Sky Park	$116,000	$258,000	1,008
Park Residences 3	$162,000	$300,000	1,620
Whitestone Beach	$102,000	$363,000	406
Paradise	$121,000	$425,000	1,004

What a low ceiling tells you is not that the project is cheap - the metre rate is mid-table - but that there is no penthouse tier in it. A building with a $1.4m top price, as Marina Village has, is selling two products: volume apartments and a handful of trophy units. Sky Park is selling one. The whole stock sits in a $142,000 band, a spread of 2.2 times from floor to ceiling, where projects of this size on the resort commonly run to five or ten times.

For a resale or rental calculation that is a double-edged fact. One product means a comparable for your unit is easy to find and the price is hard to argue with. It also means your unit competes with roughly a thousand near-identical ones in the same building, which is the main thing to weigh if you are buying to flip rather than to hold. Our $100,000-$200,000 tier comparison places Sky Park against the alternatives at the same money.

52 to 89 m²: the Narrowest Range on the Resort

Of every apartment project in the catalogue, Sky Park has the smallest gap between its smallest and largest unit: 37 m². The only narrower rows belong to the two White Villas projects, which are villas, not apartments.

Compare that with its neighbours. Park Lane spans 30-293 m², a range of 263 m². Blue Waters spans 44-587 m². Those buildings hold a studio and a duplex penthouse under one roof. Sky Park holds, effectively, one apartment type with a few variations - a two-bedroom to small three-bedroom plan, repeated 1,008 times.

That is a deliberate product choice, not an accident, and it is the clearest signal in the catalogue of who the building is for: a mid-market owner-occupier or a long-let landlord, not an investor assembling a mixed portfolio inside a single project. It also makes the building easier to assess than most. There is far less to ask about, because there is far less variation to hide a bad plan in.

24 Floors, and Why That Does Not Mean Crowded

At 24 floors Sky Park is among the taller buildings at Sea Breeze - behind Reportage Heights at 30 and Panorama by Elie Saab at 28, level with Arabian Ranches, and above the 14-16 floors of Park Lane.

Height invites an assumption about density that the numbers refuse. Sky Park puts 1,008 apartments on 5.25 hectares, which is 192 apartments per hectare. Park Lane, at 14-16 floors, puts 1,756 apartments on 3.6 hectares - 488 per hectare, two and a half times denser than the taller building.

So the 24 floors at Sky Park are not buying extra units on a cramped plot; they are buying height on a generous one. On that measure Sky Park sits twelfth of the thirty-six projects for which the catalogue publishes both a unit count and a site area - squarely mid-table, not crowded.

Two things we cannot tell you. Which floors have a sea view, and from what height. Sky Park is on the second coastline, meaning at least one row of buildings stands between it and the water, and the developer publishes no view diagram, no building footprint and no master-plan position for any project. In a 24-storey building on a second row, the floor number is likely to be the single largest driver of value inside the same floor plan - and it is exactly the variable no published figure covers.

December 2028, Without Fit-Out

Handover is given as December 2028 and the finishing as without fit-out. Both words do real work.

"Without fit-out" means a shell: you receive walls, screed and services, and you pay for everything else. Across the Sea Breeze catalogue the projects sold turnkey - Park Residences 2, Caspian Dream Liner - carry a visibly higher metre rate for that reason. Sky Park's $1,950 floor is a shell price, and any comparison you make against a furnished apartment elsewhere in Baku is not a like-for-like comparison until you add the fit-out. We do not have a credible 2028 fit-out cost for Baku to give you, so we are not going to invent one; the number to ask a contractor for is a cost per square metre for a two-bedroom shell, and then multiply by your own area.

"December 2028" is a published target, not a record. Our delivery-date slippage audit sets out what has actually happened to dates at this resort, including Emin Agalarov's own September 2026 statement that the development is 10-15% complete and needs seven to eight more years in full. A December 2028 date sits four years inside that horizon, which means a Sky Park buyer should expect to take possession with substantial construction still running around the building.

For how the metre rate compares outside the resort altogether, our price per square metre by Baku district is the relevant yardstick, and our Park Residences guide covers the four projects that most directly undercut Sky Park on price.

What to Ask

1. Which apartment actually sells at $1,950 per m²? Ask for the area and floor of a unit at that rate. The entry unit is about $2,231 per m².
2. What is the price difference between floor 3 and floor 22 of the same plan? In a 24-storey building on the second coastline this is the main variable, and it is unpublished.
3. What stands between Sky Park and the sea, and what is approved to be built there? Second coastline is a position, not a view.
4. What is the shell specification in writing? Screed, plaster, glazing, services to the apartment - and what is excluded.
5. What is the contractual handover date and the penalty for missing it? December 2028 is the marketing date.
6. How many of the 1,008 apartments are already sold, and at what prices? With one product type, that figure tells you the real market rate better than any brochure.

Sources

• Official Sea Breeze project page for Sky Park, read 25 October 2026 - 1,008 apartments; 24 floors; 52-89 m²; from $116,000 to $258,000; from $1,950 per m²; completion December 2028; status in construction; without fit-out; 5.25 ha; second coastline. Recorded in .claude/seo/data/seabreeze-official-2026-10-25.csv.
• The same catalogue of 40 Sea Breeze projects, read 25 October 2026 - the source of every comparison on this page, including the Park Residences 4 ceiling of $214,000, Park Lane's 1,756 apartments on 3.6 ha, and the area ranges of Park Lane and Blue Waters.
• Emin Agalarov, quoted by Report.az, 26 September 2026 - the 10-15% completion figure and the seven-to-eight-year horizon.
• Every per-square-metre rate marked as arithmetic on this page is our own division of the developer's published price by the developer's published area, not a figure the developer publishes.

Not verified: which floors at Sky Park have a sea view and what the premium for them is; the position of the building on the master plan and what stands between it and the water; the cost of fitting out a shell apartment in Baku in 2028; how many apartments have sold and at what price; and whether the December 2028 date appears in a contract rather than in marketing. The resort's own website returns a 403 to our tools, so nothing here was re-read after 25 October 2026 and the figures should be checked against the current page before you act on them.